Loading
Every second your website takes to load costs you visitors, conversions, and search rankings. And the biggest culprit behind slow pages? Images. They account for an average of 50% of a webpage's total weight. The good news is that modern compression techniques can slash image file sizes by 60-80% while keeping them visually identical to the originals. This guide walks you through exactly how to do it, which formats to use, what settings to choose, and how to automate the process for maximum efficiency.
Before diving into techniques, let us quantify the problem. Unoptimized images do not just make your site slow -- they have measurable business consequences:
The math is simple: compressing your images properly is one of the highest-ROI optimizations you can make.
All image compression falls into two categories, and understanding the difference is essential for making the right choice:
Lossy compression permanently removes data that the human eye cannot easily perceive. A photograph compressed at 75% quality looks virtually identical to the original in side-by-side comparisons, but the file might be 70% smaller. The removed data consists of subtle color gradients, fine noise patterns, and detail in already-complex areas where your eye naturally glosses over imperfections.
Lossless compression reorganizes image data more efficiently without removing anything. The decompressed image is pixel-for-pixel identical to the original. The tradeoff: lossless compression typically achieves only 10-30% size reduction, compared to 60-80% for lossy.
When to use each:
The format you choose determines what compression algorithms are available and how efficient they are:
JPEG remains the workhorse for photographic content. It uses lossy compression only. Best for photographs, gradients, and complex color images. Does not support transparency. At quality 75-80%, JPEG offers an excellent balance of file size and visual quality.
PNG excels at images with sharp edges, text, flat colors, and transparency. It uses lossless compression natively. PNG files are significantly larger than JPEG for photographic content, but they are the right choice for screenshots, logos, and any image requiring transparency.
WebP is the modern standard for web images. Developed by Google, WebP supports both lossy and lossless compression, and it achieves 25-35% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at equivalent quality. WebP also supports transparency and animation. In 2026, WebP is supported by every major browser, making it the default choice for new web projects.
AVIF is the cutting edge. Based on the AV1 video codec, AVIF achieves even better compression than WebP -- roughly 20% smaller files at the same quality level. Browser support has expanded significantly but is not yet as universal as WebP. AVIF is the future, but WebP is the safe present.
SVG is fundamentally different -- it is a vector format, not raster. SVGs define images using mathematical shapes rather than pixels, which means they scale to any size with zero quality loss and are typically very small files. Use SVG for logos, icons, illustrations, and any graphic that can be expressed as geometric shapes.
Finding the right quality setting is the key skill. Here are tested recommendations for the most common scenarios:
Website hero images and banners: Set JPEG quality to 70-75% or WebP quality to 72-78%. At 1920px width, target file sizes under 180KB. These images are typically viewed at full width and need to balance visual impact with load speed.
Blog and article images: Set JPEG quality to 72-78% or WebP quality to 75-80%. At 1024px width, target file sizes under 90KB. Readers are focused on the content, not pixel-peeping your images.
Thumbnails and card images: Set JPEG quality to 75-80% or WebP quality to 78-82%. At 400-640px width, target file sizes under 40KB. Small images compress extremely well and should be as tiny as possible.
E-commerce product images: Set JPEG quality to 78-82% or WebP quality to 80-85%. At 1200px width, target file sizes under 150KB. Product images need higher quality because customers zoom in to inspect details.
Email images: Set JPEG quality to 72-75%. Keep width at 600px (standard email column). Target file sizes under 60KB. Many email clients do not support WebP, so JPEG is still the safe choice.
Here is the workflow that professional web developers follow:
Step 1: Resize first. Never compress an image that is larger than its display size. If your blog post images display at 800px wide, resize the source image to 800px (or 1600px for Retina displays) before compressing. Resizing alone can reduce file size by 50-75%.
Step 2: Choose your format. For photographs and complex images, use WebP (with JPEG fallback for older systems). For screenshots, logos, and transparent images, use PNG or WebP lossless. For icons and simple graphics, use SVG when possible.
Step 3: Apply compression. Start with the recommended quality settings above and adjust based on visual inspection. Drop the quality until you notice artifacts, then step back up 5-10 points.
Step 4: Compare before and after. A good compression tool shows you a side-by-side preview so you can verify quality before saving. If you see visible banding in gradients, blurring on text, or blocky artifacts in detailed areas, increase the quality setting.
Step 5: Verify file size. Check that your compressed image meets the target file size for its use case. If it is still too large, consider resizing to smaller dimensions or switching to a more efficient format.
Beyond basic quality settings, these techniques squeeze out additional savings:
Strip metadata. Digital camera photos contain EXIF metadata -- camera model, GPS coordinates, exposure settings, timestamps. This data can add 10-100KB to every image. Unless you specifically need to preserve metadata (for photo galleries with EXIF display), strip it during compression.
Use progressive JPEG. Progressive JPEGs render in multiple passes, showing a low-quality version almost instantly and then sharpening as more data loads. This improves perceived load speed even when the total file size is the same.
Implement responsive images. Rather than serving one large image to all devices, use the HTML srcset attribute to serve appropriately sized images based on the viewer's screen width and pixel density. A mobile user on a 375px screen should not download the same 1920px image as a desktop user.
Enable lazy loading. Add loading="lazy" to image tags that are below the initial viewport. This defers loading of off-screen images until the user scrolls to them, dramatically improving initial page load time.
Consider adaptive serving. Use the Accept header to detect browser support and serve AVIF to browsers that support it, WebP to the next tier, and JPEG as the fallback. This gives every user the smallest possible file for their browser.
A critical decision is where compression happens:
Server-side compression processes images on a remote server. This is standard for services like TinyPNG, Squoosh (API mode), and ImageOptim API. The upside is powerful compression algorithms that may not run efficiently in a browser. The downside is that your images -- which may contain sensitive content -- are uploaded to a third-party server.
Client-side compression processes images entirely in your browser using JavaScript and Web APIs like Canvas and WebCodecs. Your files never leave your device. This is the approach used by Vaxtim Yoxdu's Image Compressor and is the best choice when privacy matters.
When to choose client-side:
After compressing your images, verify the impact with these tools:
Target metrics:
Try the free Image Compressor on Vaxtim Yoxdu to compress your images directly in your browser. All processing happens locally on your device -- your files never leave your machine, and there are no file size limits or usage caps.
Subscribe to get notified about new blog posts and useful tools.